I just posted my Blog Gate entry of the week. This one is about not beginning with the beginning, among other things.
-
Archives
- September 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- January 2024
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2016
- March 2015
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
-
Meta
And how does a rat-bastard lie? How, James, how?
like a rug
flat on the floor
0:)
With an apple in its mouth?
A rat-bastard never tells.
I suppose it’s too much to hope that the guilty parties will read this and repent of their boring ways. I’ve noticed the same problem lately with mysteries and romance novels as well–too much front-loading of unnecessary information. Stops me cold every time.
I think part of what bothers me–other than the boringness–is the sense that the author doesn’t trust me to stick with the story and figure out the ins and outs of the world on my own.
I know what you mean–the author isn’t content to write the book, but wants to make sure you read it the right way, and wants to tell you what to think about it.
Sometimes (not always, I’m afraid) this is due to inexperience. The guy I was complaining about is a first time novelist, which is why I made a straw man in his image and rebuked it. So even in the unlikely event he reads my post, he may not recognize himself.
Ironically, I was at the big library in Buffalo yesterday, and I looked at the books of some authors I hadn’t tried before. One seemed kind of intriguing from the back cover, so I opened it up to the first page. And the story started right after the main character’s conception. No, really. I put that one back on the shelf.
Sounds a little like Tristam Shandy. I remember it having some good lines, but in general I felt like the joke was on me.
A great deal of this is caused by the fact that so many of us nerds lack a sense of rhythm. We all should spend less time with screens and more time on the dance floor!
That’s one of the two profound qualities of Battlestar Galactica — the directors and editors lack rhythm. They are also sexist as hell in such an unrealistic way for the world they set up. So they keep making the wrong choices.
Upshot, I stopped watching it about a couple of eps into season 3.
But these flaws showed up as permenant parts of the show with the Pegasas ep. I gave them a chance to put themselves on track for a few more eps, but they just went further and further and further out into dumbness. Not to mention boring.
Love, c.
Rhythm: that is it, isn’t it? The plot has to not just move but swing.
Also too many novels are being published that really aren’t professional quality yet.
There seems to be a dearth of editors who do not give first-time novelists the eeny teeny comfy lecture disguised as lunch about ‘just,’ ‘every,’ ‘always,’ etc. are words no novelist needs to use. There are variations of this lecture, but it is the same one that illustrates ‘don’t use words that have nothing to do with what’s going on right now.’
Love, C.