A god by any other name…

Two things were interesting to me in that piece about Sandon Branderson that everyone is talking about (and that I don’t propose to link to because, eh, it’s not great and also Wired has gotten plenty of hits from it already).

First: Sanderson’s reported insensibility to pain. Is that mere stoicism, or a medical condition, or what? An actual journalist might have tried to find out. It’s too bad there wasn’t one on the job.

Second: the connection between worldmaking and religion. This is not a new idea (see Tolkien’s comments on “subcreation” in “On Fairy Stories”), but it’s a potentially useful one.

There are lots of things I think are best explained as religious phenomena these days, even if they are superficially something different. When I read an AI puff-piece/alarm-piece (two sides of the same hype coin) I usually see someone craves/loathes a god, which they call AI.

I’m not beating the drum for or against religion here. But I think understanding the religious impulse (whether it’s innate or conditioned–I have no opinion on that) is key to understanding lots of behavior, even in this ostensibly secular age.

Sixteen years ago, M. John Harrison fired off a blog post heard around the world.

Uncle Zip’s Window
the m john harrison blog

"very afraid"
January 27th, 2007

Every moment of a science fiction story must represent the triumph of writing over worldbuilding.

Worldbuilding is dull. Worldbuilding literalises the urge to invent. Worldbuilding gives an unneccessary permission for acts of writing (indeed, for acts of reading). Worldbuilding numbs the reader’s ability to fulfil their part of the bargain, because it believes that it has to do everything around here if anything is going to get done.

Above all, worldbuilding is not technically neccessary. It is the great clomping foot of nerdism. It is the attempt to exhaustively survey a place that isn’t there. A good writer would never try to do that, even with a place that is there. It isn’t possible, & if it was the results wouldn’t be readable: they would constitute not a book but the biggest library ever built, a hallowed place of dedication & lifelong study. This gives us a clue to the psychological type of the worldbuilder & the worldbuilder’s victim, & makes us very afraid.

& in other worldbuilding news: Bush adminstration announces War on Climate Change– “We’ll fight with smoke & mirrors.”
originally at http://uzwi.wordpress.com/2007/01/27/very-afraid/
snapshot recovered from the Wayback Machine.

I was annoyed by it at the time and, rereading it now, I am annoyed again.

There is a case to be made for worldbuilding. If you’re going to create a large narrative structure, you have to have some sense of the universe it’s going to happen in. The world affects the kind of action that can occur in it, and “Action is character” as John C. Hocking so brilliantly puts it. I’ve spent decades developing a few different worlds and I don’t like someone sneering at the work. The post doesn’t make its point through argument or persuasion; it’s just a bowlful of abuse that MJH is splashing on things and people that he doesn’t like.

On the other hand, after talking to a lot of people whose principal interest in fantasy is developing a world with hard-edged rules that make magic as mundane as a set of municipal regulations, I’ve developed a grudging acknowledgement for Harrison’s point. World-discovery is at least as important as world-building, and when the writer participates in that experience along with the reader, some interesting things can happen. It’s the outliner-vs.-improviser conundrum transferred from plot to setting.

A writer’s propensity to follow one path or the other can be viewed as a personality difference, but it’s also a religious difference. If you’re an Apollonian “God has a plan!” sort of person, you’ll go with worldbuilding. If you’re a Dionysian “God says get on the dancefloor!” sort of person, you’ll go with world discovery. If your Parnassus has two peaks, you may even have it both ways.

Left: Apollo with his lyre; right: Dionysus with a cup of wine
A 19th C. print by Binteau & Rey from an ancient vase-painting;
found at the NYPL site

If you’re an atheist and all this god-talk makes you uncomfortable, that’s something that the inventor of the Apollonian/Dionysian distinction would sympathize with. But I’d also urge you not to be so squeamish that you fail to understand yourself—the kind of mistake about religion that prudes make about sex. The religious impulse is present even in irreligious people, leading to absurdities like the Rapture of the Nerds. If it is present in you (not something I get to have an opinion about; that’s between you and your shadow), you’ll want to wrestle with that angel, or at least buy it a cup of coffee and see what it has in mind.

Posted in AI is a misnomer, fantasy, writing | Comments Off on A god by any other name…

Trump or Carinus?

text: "He was soft, yet cruel; devoted to pleasure, but destitute of taste; and, though exquisitely susceptible of vanity, indifferent to the public esteem."--Gibbon, Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire ch.12
If the shoe fits…
Posted in history, Roman history, Rome | Comments Off on Trump or Carinus?

Springy

Happy Equinox to my fellow Tellurians. All visitors: please make sure your waiver forms have been signed.

https://manuelsantosmusico.bandcamp.com/track/equinox

Text: "Equinox" from JAZZ TA by Manuel Santos (2018)

Image: a paining of a guitar
Posted in music | Comments Off on Springy

The Weird of the Worm

Reading Snorri’s account of Ragnarǫkr this noon over blunch, and I was struck by this poetic phrase in Snorri’s prose: Þórr berr banaorð af Miðgarðsormi “Thor bears the baneword from Midgard’s Serpent”.

On the left, a monstrous snake breathing out fiery poison. On the right, a man holds his glaved left hand over his face while he wields a hammer in his right hand.
Jormungandir vs. Thor at Ragnarǫk;
illustration from the D’Aulaires’ Norse Gods and Giants

Old Norse orð is cognate with English word, both of them derived from PIE *wer– “speak”, making them cognate with verb, verve, irony, and the rhe– in rhetoric. I also wanted it to be cognate with weird “doom” but Watkins and the AHD gave me no comfort there, saying it comes from a different PIE root *wer– meaning “turn, bend”. Since speech occurs serially, like road or a string or anything that might bend, it seems to me that the “speak” root may actually be an extension of the “bend” root. That’s just speculation, but it gave me a great title for this blogpost (and maybe someday a Morlock story).

In ON, orð can be “summons”, “verdict” or “message”. Probably it means the latter here: Thor brings away from his fight with Jormungandir the news that the mighty Worm is dead.

But he doesn’t bring it very far: ok stígr þaðan braut níu fet. Þá fellr hann dauðr til jarðar fyrir eitri því er ormrinn blæss á hann “and he walks nine steps away from there. Then he falls dead to the Earth because of the poison that the Worm breathed on him.”

Nine is a magic number (3×3) and the Earth is Thor’s mother, so in a sense he lies dead in her arms. There are a lot of layers in this mythic onion.

Posted in art, books, fantasy, fantasy art, Morlock, Myth & Legend, words | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Weird of the Worm

Accidental Theology (or Zoology)

Typo of the day: amle (for an intended male).

Amle looks like a real word, but I’m not sure what it’d mean. In OI ama is “to vex, annoy” so maybe Amlé would be like Purgatory for Norse Gimlé (“High Heaven”).

Or maybe amle is just animal said really fast because one is after you.

Animal from THE MUPPET SHOW playing drums
Posted in language, Typo of the Day, words, writing | Comments Off on Accidental Theology (or Zoology)

Old Moon 1 & 2

These monochrome beauties came in the mail today.

left cover displays two armed warriors fighting while animated skeletons approach through a winter landscape

right cover displays a nightmarish cloaked figure surrounded by stray black feathers
Left: Old Moon Quarterly 1, cover art by Caitlin E. Camp.
Right: Old Moon Quarterly 2, cover art by Christopher Maxwell.
Posted in art, books, fantasy, fantasy art, sword-and-sorcery, writing | Comments Off on Old Moon 1 & 2

Them Dry Bones

I misread an Old Norse word bœnhús (“begging from house to house”) as beinhús (“bonehouse”), and now I can’t get that wrong word out of my head. Maybe, in an upcoming story, Morlock will be trapped in a bonehouse. It ought to have universal appeal: we’re all trapped in our own bonehouses.

Posted in language, Morlock, Typo of the Day, words, writing | Comments Off on Them Dry Bones

Rocktrek Files

Some people say that Everything Is Star Trek. Some people say not. Some aren’t sure.

But the evidence speaks for itself.

a mosaic of images: Nichelle Nichols as Uhura faces an unnamed crewman; James Garner as Rockford assumes the position on his Firebird at the behest of a policeman; William Shatner as Kirk plays cards with Lee Delano as Kalo; Lee Delano as "Man with Flat Tire" sits in a car with a flat tire; Garner as Rockford peers wilily from behind a lamppost.
Screenshots from “The Man Trap”, “In Pursuit of Carol Thorne”,
“Where No Man Has Gone Before”, and “A Piece of the Action”.

In the upper left panel we see the Incredible Salt Vampire threatening Lt. Uhura in the guise of a crewman. It later faked its own death on the Enterprise, lived for a time stealing salt from the galley and living on the hangar deck, and finally escaped from the Enterprise when the ship visited Earth in the mid-1960s. In the upper center panel we see the Incredible Salt Vampire, 7 or 8 years older, in the guise of a city cop, attempting to draw the salt of life from the shoulderblade of Intertemporal Missions Force Agent (disavowed) James S. Rockford. The vampire was defeated by the filtering effects of 1970s polyester, a primitive material unknown to the creature’s advanced science.

(James Scott Rockford, collateral ascendant of Montgomery Scott, was also, as is now known, the distant ancestor of James Kirk. The proof of that was staring us in the face all the time: why else would Gary Mitchell, Kirk’s longtime friend, make a tombstone with the name “James R. Kirk” when he must have known that Kirk’s middle initial was T-for-Tiberius? Clearly he was taunting Kirk with the Rockford family’s long tradition of Federation service. Kirk later killed Mitchell for making light of the sacred name of Rockford, as was only fair and just.)

In the lower left panel, we see Captain James T. Kirk teaching Kalo, a gangster on the planet Iotia, the game of Fizzbin. In the lower right panel we see Kalo, having escaped Iotia and the 23rd century in an illegal time-displacement device, under the watchful eye of IMF Agent Rockford. Rockford had become suspicious of Kalo when the gangster referred to his car as a flivver and tried to inveigle Rockford into playing something called Fizzbin, an obviously phony game.

So there you have it. Don’t argue with me. Argue with the Truth.

Posted in mystery, sff, television | Tagged , | Comments Off on Rocktrek Files

Swords in the Mistletoe

I was reading Snorri’s Edda today, trying to sort out the story-differences between Snorri’s version and the poems in the Elder Edda.

For instance, the famous story where Thor goes fishing and catches Jormungandir, Midgard’s Serpent, plays out differently in Snorri’s “Gylfaginning” and the Hymiskvíða. Snorri frames it as Thor’s revenge against Jormungandir for pretending to be a cat and humiliating him in a contest in Útgarð, which is a stretch. (That’s super-funny if you know the story. Fairly funny. Maybe a little funny.) In the Eddic poem, Tyr brings Thor to the hall of the giant Hymir, who is apparently Tyr’s grandfather, to get a gigantic cauldron to brew beer for the Æsir’s feast with Ægir. In Snorri’s version, Hymir cuts the fishing line, releasing the monster, and Thor furiously punches the giant on the ear, sending him headfirst into the water–maybe killing him, maybe not. In the Hymiskvíða, Thor undergoes various challenges that ultimately earn him the gigantic cauldron, and when Hymir and his crew try to attack the Æsir as they’re leaving, Thor knocks their various blocks off with Mjǫllnir—a somewhat disappointing ending, I’ve often thought.

A man in a boat threatens a sea-monster with a hammer; the other man in the boat is scared.
Manuscript painting from SÁM 66, an 18th century MS. of Snorri’s Edda,
image borrowed from Wikimedia.

Then there’s the story of Baldr’s dreams foretelling his death, and how Frigg’s attempts to evade this bad result helped bring it about (a tragic pattern that Oedipus and Acrisius and other classical types would recognize). Loki displays his usual gender fluidity in this story, changing himself into a woman and getting an incautious Frigg to tell him that she had exacted promises not to harm Baldr from everything in the world: metal, and stones, and poisons, and people, and beasts, and snakes, and everything—except one thing.

Vex viðarteinungr einn fyrir vestan Valhǫll. Sá er mistilteinn kallaðr. Sá þótti mér ungr at krefja eiðsins.

Snorri, Edda “Gylfaginning” 49

“A wood-sprout grows on the west side of Valhalla. It’s called ‘mistletoe’. It seemed (too) young for me to demand an oath from it.”

mistletoe growing parasitically on a tree trunk
image of mistletoe snerged from Wikimedia

It takes me forever to get through sentences like this, not because they’re so very complex but because there’s such a multitude of things to look up and think about.

Valhalla is “death hall”, of course, but it also occurred to me on this reading that the west is associated with death in lots of cultures, especially classical ones, so the direction Frigg gives for the mistletoe is doomful in and of itself. Then there’s that weird word viðarteinungr. Zoëga glosses it as “wand”, which clearly doesn’t work here; but the Norse word is a compound of viðar “wood” and teinungr “sprout”, which effectively describes what mistletoe does: sprout on wood.

Then there’s mistilteinn, the Norse word for mistletoe itself. At first my lazy eye read the second root as steinn “stone”, which would have been interesting for a number of reasons. But no, it’s just teinn “twig, sprout” again—cognate with English tiny, as it turns out.

“But where do toes come into it?” I wondered, as I have often wondered about mistletoe. The answer is, they don’t. The Old English cognate for teinn is tān, and the ā of OE becomes ō in later English. People misheard mistiltōn as mistletoe(n), and started writing it that way, a form of language change called an eggcorn.

And the mistle (or mistil)? That, says Calvert Watkins and the AHD, derives from PIE *meigh- “to urinate”, and is cognate with mist, mizzle, and Latin mingere “to urinate”. Think of that the next time you’re walking through a misty, mizzling rain, or even reading Swords in the Mist.

Posted in books, language, Myth & Legend, words | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Swords in the Mistletoe

The AI of the Beholder

I swear, if I see another article anthropomorphizing/deifying/demonizing AI, I will… well, not read it, I guess. This trendlet is really getting tedious.

Adam Gopnik has something in the New Yorker this week about AI, which isn’t completely wrongheaded but treats the extruded art-product of AI far too seriously.

He contrasts the ineptitude of chatbot writing with the more impressive output of artbots, saying “asked to make an album cover <for the Beatles> in Magritte’s manner, dall-e 2 responds in ways that are often arresting, even witty.”

This is the example he provides.

Four men in suits looking toward sunset with their backs to the viewer.

If this image is witty, I guess I don’t get the joke. It looks like four separate images of guys that have been badly photoshopped into the background of an inspirational poster, two of them made by someone who doesn’t understand how human hair works, all of them made by someone who doesn’t know how human legs work. One misses the clarity and pseudo-realism that lends Magritte’s surrealism its ironic power. More importantly, we’re missing the floating apple or the bowler suspended in midair above a suit—the jarring element that makes every Magritte painting into a visual koan.

So-called AI continues to be a Rorschach blot for the people looking at it. But I’m not sure what most people have to say is of interest to anyone except their analyst.

Posted in AI is a misnomer, art, writing | Comments Off on The AI of the Beholder